Kyoto, dyr og dårlig Mere Kyoto efter 2012?
Pris og effekt Pris for Kyoto: Forløbig omkring 60 mia $. Effekt: afvigelse fra udviklingen uden intervention ca. 0,1 C - omkring år Up.htmhttp:// Up.htm.
Varmt eller koldt?
Ingen ”global” opvarming i USA Annual mean surface temperatures in the contiguous United States between 1895 and (Jf. også disskussion om sammenhæng mellem CO2 og Temperatur)
CO2=Food for plants ”As atmospheric CO2 increases, plant growth rates increase. Also, leaves lose less water as CO2 increases, so that plants are able to grow under drier conditions. Animal life, which depends upon plant life for food, increases proportionally. ”
En klar sammenhæng? Frygt for ny istid i perioden som følge af global nedkøling
1%20The%20past%20is%20the%20key%20to%20the%20present.pdf
Pris og effekt? as.pdf
Prisen værd? The effect on global temperature rise of cuts in greenhouse gas emissions proposed by the “Old” Kyoto Protocol drafted in 1997 and the “New” Kyoto agreement drafted in July
1%20The%20past%20is%20the%20key%20to%20the%20present.pdf
Icehouse or hothouse? “During the last 2 billion years the Earth's climate has alternated between a frigid "Ice House", like today's world, and a steaming "Hot House", like the world of the dinosaurs.”
Hothouse or icehouse?
En klar sammenhæng mellem Co2 og gennemsnits-temperaturen?