Overskrift her Navn på oplægsholder Navn på KU- enhed For at ændre ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: Klik i menulinjen, vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”.

Præsentationer af emnet: "Overskrift her Navn på oplægsholder Navn på KU- enhed For at ændre ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: Klik i menulinjen, vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”."— Præsentationens transcript:

1 Overskrift her Navn på oplægsholder Navn på KU- enhed For at ændre ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: Klik i menulinjen, vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for dato og ”Enhedens navn” i Sidefod Dias 1 The Role of Research Management in Achieving Impact Jan Andersen, Senior Executive Advisor Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen INORMS 2014 Session 59 15:00 – 16:15 Saturday 12 April 201

2 In the 1990’s and onward there was a focus on research outcome in terms of patents and other potential valuable output from research which led to the establishing of Patent- and TechTrans Offices in many universities. But the recent development of broadening the expectations to the research community to contribute to the solving of societal challenges in general, changes the way impact of research should be interpreted and understood, and simple Result-Patent equation must be reviewed. In this, research administrators form the link between understanding the need of the funders and the potential of the research and can become valuable brokers in the meeting of the demands from the funders on one side, and the integrity of research on the other side. This session will describe different ways the concept of ”Impact” has changed, and discuss how links in universities and research organisations can be established between the research support office and the patent- and tech-trans offices in order to meet the new requirements from funders and society. The session will draw on experiences from the UK Research Exercise Framework and the European Framework Program for research, Horizon 2020.

3 Tekst starter uden punktopstilling For at få punkt- opstilling på teksten, brug forøg indrykning For at få venstre- stillet tekst uden punktopstilling, brug formindsk indrykning Overskrift her For at ændre ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: Klik i menulinjen, vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for dato og ”Enhedens navn” i Sidefod Background Master Danish Language and Computer Science 1995 1994 Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen 1999 Rectors Office, University of Copenhagen 2005 Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University (Merged with KU 2007) 2006 Merger Secretariate, University of Copenhagen 2007 Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen 2012 Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen Research Manager Profile:  External funding of Research - EU-Liason Officer  Research policy, strategy and planning  Research output, performance indicators - CURIS  International dimension – EARMA Chair 2010-2013 DARMA, NUAS, SRA, NCURA… Innovative initiatives: Øresund University, EU-Erfa, DARMA, CURIS, CRF, UoC Merger-process Real Competence:  Ability to read the map  Courage to make new paths  Will to go for the vision

4 Rector Prorector University Director Faculty of Humanities Faculty of Law Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Science Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University Finance Campus Service University IT University Education Services Research & Innovation Communication Faculty of Theology 8 Departments Board of the University HR BRIC Biotech Research & Innovation Center 6 Departments 12 Departments 13 Departments Rector’s Office Established in 1472, and with over 38,000 students and more than 9,000 employees, the University of Copenhagen is the oldest and largest institution of research and education in Denmark.

5 Dias 5

6 Trends in research management Control to Service  The researcher in focus, not the admin system  Targeted support and information  Direct communication  Proactive approach Funding complexity  From national to international funding  From small individual funds to large corporates  Competitive funding  Research for research’s sake to research for society Centralisation and decentralisation  Critical mass in support functions  Policy: Role and power management level  Legalisation and rules: e.g institutional commitment  Department sizes and faculties…Size for Sizes sake Why we need competent, professional administration www.earma.org Societal expectations  3% GDP  Societal Challenges  Mass-university

7 Dias 7 Figures from OECD, 2013 (statistic database) World Bank Indicators, China only; Wikipedia, based on Battelle R&D Magazine Annual Global Funding Forecast In 1906, James McKeen Cattell, editor of Science, published the first edition of a directory of researchers in the United States. It included 4,000 biographies on “men who have carried out research work”. Godin and Lane, 2012 Developement in R&D investment in % of GDP

8 Dias 8 Sted og dato European Union Innovation Scoreboard, 2014

9 Tekst starter uden punktopstilling For at få punkt- opstilling på teksten, brug forøg indrykning For at få venstre- stillet tekst uden punktopstilling, brug formindsk indrykning Overskrift her For at ændre ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: Klik i menulinjen, vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for dato og ”Enhedens navn” i Sidefod Technological readiness level (TRL)

10 Excellence versus Impact? Dias 10 Impact Science Society Science Society “Science and innovation are key factors that will help Europe to move towards smart, sustainable, inclusive growth, and along the way to tackle its pressing societal challenges, as recognized in the EU Multi-annual Financial Framework for 2014 to 2020” SEC(2011) 1427

11 Research Dias 11 “Research and experimental development (R&D) comprise creative work undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge, including knowledge of man, culture and society, and the use of this stock of knowledge to devise new applications”. (Frascati manual 2002)

12 Horizon 2020 – 72 Billion EUR 2014-2020 1. Excellent Science 2. Industrial Leadership 3. Societal Challenges ERC – European Research Council FET – Future and Emerging Technologies Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Research Infrastructure LEIT-Leadership in Enabling & Industrial Technologies  Information and communication technologies  Nanotechnologies  Materials  Biotechnology  Manufacturing  Space Access to Risk Finance Innovation in SME [1] Health, Demographic Change and Wellbeing [2] Food security, substainable agriculture, marine and maritime research and bioeconomy [3] Secure, clean and efficient energy [4] Smart, green and integrated transport [5] Climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials [6] Inclusive and innovative societies [7] Secure societies

13 Tekst starter uden punktopstilling For at få punkt- opstilling på teksten, brug forøg indrykning For at få venstre- stillet tekst uden punktopstilling, brug formindsk indrykning Overskrift her For at ændre ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: Klik i menulinjen, vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for dato og ”Enhedens navn” i Sidefod Impact in Horizon 2020 Evaluation Criterias Dias 13 The extent to which the outputs of the project should contribute at the European and/or International level to: • Enhancing innovation capacity and integration of new knowledge; • Strengthening the competitiveness and growth of companies by developing innovations meeting the needs of European and global markets; • and, where relevant, by delivering such innovations to the markets; • Any other environmental and socially important impacts (not already covered above); • Effectiveness of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results (including management of IPR), to communicate the project, and to manage research data where relevant. EXCELLENCE (3/5) IMPACT (3/5) MANAGEMENT (3/5) (10/15)

14 Tekst starter uden punktopstilling For at få punkt- opstilling på teksten, brug forøg indrykning For at få venstre- stillet tekst uden punktopstilling, brug formindsk indrykning Overskrift her For at ændre ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: Klik i menulinjen, vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for dato og ”Enhedens navn” i Sidefod The Research Exercise Framework (UK) Purpose: Assessment of the quality of research in UK higher education institutions -> Funding, accountability and benchmarking OUPUT (65%) IMPACT (20%) ENVIRONMENT (15%) The impact of research is to be documented in cases, describing impacts that have provided benefits to one or more areas of the economy, society, culture, public policy and services, health, production, environment, international development or quality of life, whether locally, regionally, nationally or internationally. Impacts can be manifested in a wide variety of ways including, but not limited to: the many types of beneficiary (individuals, organisations, communities, regions and other entities); impacts on products, processes, behaviours, policies, practices; and avoidance of harm or the waste of resources. Reach: the spread or breadth of influence or effect on the relevant constituencies Significance: the intensity of the influence or effect. Dias 14

15 Dias 15

16 Tekst starter uden punktopstilling For at få punkt- opstilling på teksten, brug forøg indrykning For at få venstre- stillet tekst uden punktopstilling, brug formindsk indrykning Overskrift her For at ændre ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: Klik i menulinjen, vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for dato og ”Enhedens navn” i Sidefod Idea Application Contract Project Management Audit Project lifecycle Dias 16 TTO & Patenting Office

17 Results Dias 17 Research Support Office? Communication Office TTO & Patenting Office Articles and publications  ”Greasy money”  ”Policy”  ”you can write that”  ”I’m done”  ”Valley of death (sigh!)”  etc

18 Dias 18 Possible resultsPossible UsersWhat the user calls the results Routes for Exploitation Funding for Exploitation Publications IT System Software New Material Document Demonstration Pilot Site Data, Database Methodology Alogithm Expert System Protocol IPR, Patent, Copyright Training Material CD ROM, Video Website Workshop, Conference Network Animal Model New Strains Molecular Candidates Cell Culture New Platform New Tools Joint Publications Documents Mobility/Exchange IT Network Knowledge Sharing IPR Policy Spreading Excellence COLLEAGUES BUSINESS Manufacturing Business Service Business POLICY MAKERS EU Policy Maker National Policy Maker Regional Policy Maker PUBLIC SERVICES Public Services, Health RESEARCH CENTRES University Research Centre Contract Research Organisation EDUCATION BODY Universities, Colleges Secondary Schools Primary Schools SOCIAL SERVICES Public Social Services Voluntary Organisations, NGO STANDARDS BODY International Standards EU Standards National Standards The Public The Citizen description Application Phase CASE: Århus University Further R&D Commercial - Product - Service - improved process Patent New Standard Education Policy Public service Research funding EU Funding National Funding Regional Funding Private Funding Business Angels European Investment Bank Eureka Venture Capital From Seán McCarthy, Hyperion

19 Dias 19 CRFII 2012

20 Tekst starter uden punktopstilling For at få punkt- opstilling på teksten, brug forøg indrykning For at få venstre- stillet tekst uden punktopstilling, brug formindsk indrykning Overskrift her For at ændre ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: Klik i menulinjen, vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for dato og ”Enhedens navn” i Sidefod Recommendations from Copenhagen Research Forum  Societal challenges can only solved in a true multi- and cross-disciplinary research context  Excellence is the key driver for impact  Striking a balance between the short and long term impact needs  Inclusion of end-user perspectives and encouragement of private companies to participate in the challenge oriented research to secure impact  Achieving impact through continuous dialogue between researchers and end-users/society throughout the projects  Facilitating impact by commercialising the best ideas and bridging the valley of death CRFII 2012 Dias 20

21 Symbiosis of Research Management and Research Administration Dias 21 Large highly specialized International reseach teams Political environment of funders and stakeholders Full research Lifecycle from idea to technology transfer Project administration From budget to audit Communication IPR Technology Transfer Collaboration with Industry Research Management Research Administration

22 Tekst starter uden punktopstilling For at få punkt- opstilling på teksten, brug forøg indrykning For at få venstre- stillet tekst uden punktopstilling, brug formindsk indrykning Overskrift her For at ændre ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: Klik i menulinjen, vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for dato og ”Enhedens navn” i Sidefod Challenges A: The pro’s and con’s of an proactive role of the RSO in achieveing impact for research – and what is your own RSO role at the moment (strength and weaknesses) (5 min) B: What would be implications of a change in the role of the RSO? – Who would/should be a driver? (Opportunities and Threaths) (5 min) C: Recommendations for follow-up initiatives (Evaluation) (5 min) Dias 22